czm-_-
Member
Posts: 76
Registered on: May 2017
|
Post by czm-_- on Jun 17, 2017 21:14:31 GMT
You should be free of modding in GTA Online when the next game patch comes out I'll believe that when I see it.
|
|
|
Post by Blade died for our sins on Jun 17, 2017 21:25:21 GMT
Hello everyone, (This post will also be in my own thread about avoiding money). As of today, major trainer developers have recieved the cease and desist and thus have stopped development. You should be free of modding in GTA Online when the next game patch comes out. Sources: DatSaintsfan's most recent video, ForceHax website. First of all, one trainer is down. at the time of writing one was down, now most of the major ones are Second of all, citing a DatSaintsFan video as a source is worse than citing no source at all Finally, modding online will never be over. It may go down but it'll never be completely gone
|
|
Theign
Member
Professional Cynic since 1912
Posts: 282
Registered on: June 2016
Steam: Hinty
Social Club: Theign
Discord: Hinty#8743
|
Post by Theign on Jun 18, 2017 2:11:43 GMT
And thus, why they had to shut down Open IV.
Because if they took a trainer to court, the guy making it would just say "Oh but Mr Judge, Open IV has been modding their games for a decade and they haven't done a thing to stop them. They cant just pick on me and leave them alone."
|
|
czm-_-
Member
Posts: 76
Registered on: May 2017
|
Post by czm-_- on Jun 18, 2017 9:49:17 GMT
now most of the major ones are Did they only address the paid versions as some people were suspecting or have they expanded it to cheating tools in general?
|
|
Hystery
Member
Posts: 556
Registered on: August 2016
Steam: DraconisRex
Social Club: Hystery
|
Post by Hystery on Jun 18, 2017 10:08:48 GMT
And thus, why they had to shut down Open IV. Because if they took a trainer to court, the guy making it would just say "Oh but Mr Judge, Open IV has been modding their games for a decade and they haven't done a thing to stop them. They cant just pick on me and leave them alone." Yeah, except that, again, their functions are completely different. I'm pretty sure even the dumbest judge could make a difference between a script editor that disturbs the online experience for everyone, and an archive editor that works only for the offline mode and allows only for modification of models, textures, sounds, etc. Not too difficult of a concept to grasp IMO. T2 could have -perfectly- picked on menus for how they ruin the online, while leaving OpenIV alone, because it's not the same thing, at all. They're just money-greedy bastards. Modding has been part of the GTA games for as long as it was on released on PC, and it never bothered them so far. They just don't want the Liberty City add-on made by the OpenIV team to be released (or they'd look like a bunch of lazy sorry asses for not doing that), and they don't want people to see what content they keep dripfeeding to milk sharkcards as much as they can.
|
|
RA3236
Member
Posts: 73
Registered on: March 2017
Xbox GT: RA3236
Social Club: RA3236
Discord: RA3236#0829
|
Post by RA3236 on Jun 18, 2017 10:13:42 GMT
Can someone confirm this post from a guy on the KSP Forums:
That's the thing... the "cracking" WAS DONE LEGALLY... That's the whole point of clean reverse engineering. A license and law are not one and the same. It's not illegal to reverse engineer something. It might be against the license to do so. That's where a clean reverse engineering effort comes into the picture. One team reverse engineers the game. Sure that violates the license, but no code is created. Since they created no code, there's no software in violation of the license. All they do is document the overall operations of the code... Not actual code, just what the code does. The second team takes that documentation and then writes NEW and ORIGINAL code, having never, ever actually seen the original GTA code before. By following the behavior documentation, they create an original LEGAL work that just so happens to be (mostly) compatible with the targeted software, and they have never looked at the target software's code. This is how reverse engineering works.
Reverse engineering is legal!
Even the team that created OpenIV said it themselves... They could have taken this to court to prove their case against Take-Two, and probably could have even won the case under fair use... They documented their reverse engineering process, and could prove in a court that their software was legit reverse engineered, and is not a derivative of licensed code, thus immune from Take_Two's C&D. They could have done that... IF they had the time and money to do it, and were willing to deal with the abysmal stress of it. Unfortunately, it's not worth the hell that the would go through by going to court against a giant company for them to fight it.
They didn't give up cause they were wrong.
They didn't give up because their software is illegal (it is NOT illegal)
They gave up, cause fighting is hard, expensive, time consuming, and stressful.
Take-Two are a bunch of two-faced liars when they claim OpenIV is illegal. They. Are. Lying. To. You! Their EULA is not law, and reverse engineering is legal.
Don't be sheeple, people!
As to the claim that going after the modding tool "makes sense"... Look at GTA V's rating on Steam right now... Take-Two vilified themselves. They WILL lose customers over this. People will stop buying Shark Cards over this... They won't lose everyone, no... But they lost a great deal of respect, and exchanged it with utter hatred and contempt. There are safe harbor laws... You don't go after an ISP for hosting a piracy website... You take down the website. Going after OpenIV is like going after the ISP cause there's a piracy site on it. What Take-Two did was morally bankrupt. It will hurt them in the long run, if they fail to fix this. OpenIV was never the problem. Taking down OpenIV didn't stop the online MP hacking (cause it has nothing to do with the online MP hacking), and they killed their own SP community because they are greedy $#!+$ that WANT Single Player to die down, and force people onto the more financially lucrative Multiplayer online mode, to be microtransactioned to death.
You don't go after the ISP cause there's a piracy website hosted by it. You go after the site, not the ISP.
You don't go after the modding tool, when a handful of mods enables monetized content. You go after the mods, not the tool.
As long as Rockstar uses Take-Two as a publisher, Rockstar will never see another purchase from me again. I won't be paying jack$#!+ for any KSP DLC either. I REFUSE to support Take-Two in any way. They can burn for all I care.
|
|
|
Post by Blade died for our sins on Jun 18, 2017 12:53:05 GMT
now most of the major ones are Did they only address the paid versions as some people were suspecting or have they expanded it to cheating tools in general? Well the only ones that worked online were the paid ones so maybe
|
|
|
Post by OhHiMarc on Jun 18, 2017 13:27:53 GMT
Never knew they could demand suchs a thing...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Registered on: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 1:28:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by endersai on Jun 19, 2017 4:22:09 GMT
When it comes to drip feeding content, that doesn't give people an excuse to mod the system to get the cars early. You don't go into a shop demanding to know the future prices and quality of future stock. However if you don't like a business model, you can refuse to shop there. We live in a capitalist world, vote and control suppliers with your wallet, not with your hacks. Except that your analogy is slightly off. If I took your example, it'd be more of a client asking for the price and quality of what is already in sale but unavailable at this time, rather than what will be in stock in the future, because the cars are already in the game. Just inaccessible. While I understand their bullshit excuse of a "it's our game" and the fact that they do that only to trick people to spend all their money on what is released at th start only to try and force them to buy sharkcards to buy what is dripfed later on, it definitely also gives an excuse for players to mod the game to see what cars are going to be released in the same update, so they don't end scammed by the company they actually trusted to provide hours of entertainment when they bought the game. It's true, if you don't like a business model, you can refuse to shop there. Except that, well, we all already bought the game, so it's a bit late for that, and we can't do much else for now. Well, I think the point it actually that players need to recognise the FOMO/entitlement mentality aspect, and stop dancing to R*'s tune. Yes, the cars are drip fed to maximise SharkCard sales; those same SharkCards demonstrably pay for updates like this one. Don't just take my word for it, read T2's annual report. If, in the real world, people shopped like they do in GTA we'd have stupid levels of debt... oh. Well. If they shopped for cars the way they do IRL then my god the angst around model changes would be profound. "I bought the Mk VI Golf R! They just released the Mk 8! This is bullshit!" "Well, did you research first? Ask them? Test drive? Compare and contrast?" "Erm. No..." The drip feeds are not new - see also T20 and Osiris. The shark card economy is not new. R* were clear that modding would be a SP experience only so their intolerance of MP modding in general (script injections or not) is not new. Basically, this boils down to expectations wildly out of alignment with reality not being met, and instead of being adjusted they are used as the basis of complaints.
|
|
|
Post by endersai on Jun 19, 2017 4:27:25 GMT
Can someone confirm this post from a guy on the KSP Forums: That's the thing... the "cracking" WAS DONE LEGALLY... That's the whole point of clean reverse engineering. A license and law are not one and the same. It's not illegal to reverse engineer something. It might be against the license to do so. That's where a clean reverse engineering effort comes into the picture. One team reverse engineers the game. Sure that violates the license, but no code is created. Since they created no code, there's no software in violation of the license. All they do is document the overall operations of the code... Not actual code, just what the code does. The second team takes that documentation and then writes NEW and ORIGINAL code, having never, ever actually seen the original GTA code before. By following the behavior documentation, they create an original LEGAL work that just so happens to be (mostly) compatible with the targeted software, and they have never looked at the target software's code. This is how reverse engineering works. Reverse engineering is legal! Even the team that created OpenIV said it themselves... They could have taken this to court to prove their case against Take-Two, and probably could have even won the case under fair use... They documented their reverse engineering process, and could prove in a court that their software was legit reverse engineered, and is not a derivative of licensed code, thus immune from Take_Two's C&D. They could have done that... IF they had the time and money to do it, and were willing to deal with the abysmal stress of it. Unfortunately, it's not worth the hell that the would go through by going to court against a giant company for them to fight it. They didn't give up cause they were wrong. They didn't give up because their software is illegal (it is NOT illegal) They gave up, cause fighting is hard, expensive, time consuming, and stressful. Take-Two are a bunch of two-faced liars when they claim OpenIV is illegal. They. Are. Lying. To. You! Their EULA is not law, and reverse engineering is legal. Don't be sheeple, people! As to the claim that going after the modding tool "makes sense"... Look at GTA V's rating on Steam right now... Take-Two vilified themselves. They WILL lose customers over this. People will stop buying Shark Cards over this... They won't lose everyone, no... But they lost a great deal of respect, and exchanged it with utter hatred and contempt. There are safe harbor laws... You don't go after an ISP for hosting a piracy website... You take down the website. Going after OpenIV is like going after the ISP cause there's a piracy site on it. What Take-Two did was morally bankrupt. It will hurt them in the long run, if they fail to fix this. OpenIV was never the problem. Taking down OpenIV didn't stop the online MP hacking (cause it has nothing to do with the online MP hacking), and they killed their own SP community because they are greedy $#!+$ that WANT Single Player to die down, and force people onto the more financially lucrative Multiplayer online mode, to be microtransactioned to death. You don't go after the ISP cause there's a piracy website hosted by it. You go after the site, not the ISP. You don't go after the modding tool, when a handful of mods enables monetized content. You go after the mods, not the tool. As long as Rockstar uses Take-Two as a publisher, Rockstar will never see another purchase from me again. I won't be paying jack$#!+ for any KSP DLC either. I REFUSE to support Take-Two in any way. They can burn for all I care. So, basically the issue is the angry person What Wrote That has never done contracts law. They haven't done IP law either, aside from their PhD at the University of Google.
|
|
Tsupernami
Member
Posts: 1,414
Registered on: November 2015
Steam: Tsupernami
Social Club: Tsupernami
Discord: Tsupernami#6025
|
Post by Tsupernami on Jun 19, 2017 5:22:11 GMT
I used to disagree with you on this ender but my opinion has changed. Simply put, don't like it, don't but it. Tell others not to buy it, but provide the opportunity for others to break the law, and then you're in torrent website territory.
Sure it's not technically your fault, but you provided the means to allow others to do it and did nothing to stop it. It's like selling a gun to someone and not doing a background check of any sort.
Now the other point is that OpenIV only affects single player, which doesn't hurt their sales. Well in a small way it can. You can use it to test vehicles before MP release before deciding if you want it. That's why they don't release new vehicles there any more, they don't want people to know how good they are before purchasing.
Yes it's a dirty tactic, but they're entitled to do it. I reiterate, if you don't like it, don't buy it.
|
|
|
Post by endersai on Jun 19, 2017 5:32:55 GMT
It's also, to people - don't layer onto R* what you expect them to do. Listen to what they say they will do, and if it falls short, then react. Punishing them because your whims, which R* never promised you they'd cater to, weren't catered to is idiotic.
Borrowing the less pithy part of this GB Shaw quote... "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself."
|
|
drknut
Member
Posts: 387
Registered on: August 2016
Steam: Knut
Social Club: DrKnut
|
Post by drknut on Jun 19, 2017 6:18:45 GMT
If they shopped for cars the way they do IRL then my god the angst around model changes would be profound. "I bought the Mk VI Golf R! They just released the Mk 8! This is bullshit!" "Well, did you research first? Ask them? Test drive? Compare and contrast?" "Erm. No..." With all due respect, but this analogy is so way off, that it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. This comparison would only make sense if all cars were to be sold by the government and the government would also be controlling the FIA and thus setting the rules and conditions under which every single racing car event would take place. Otherwise I agree: inform yourself, be patient and vote with your wallet.
|
|
|
Post by endersai on Jun 19, 2017 7:46:21 GMT
If they shopped for cars the way they do IRL then my god the angst around model changes would be profound. "I bought the Mk VI Golf R! They just released the Mk 8! This is bullshit!" "Well, did you research first? Ask them? Test drive? Compare and contrast?" "Erm. No..." With all due respect, but this analogy is so way off, that it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. This comparison would only make sense if all cars were to be sold by the government and the government would also be controlling the FIA and thus setting the rules and conditions under which every single racing car event would take place. Otherwise I agree: inform yourself, be patient and vote with your wallet. Erm, my point was about wildly out of alignment entitlement mentalities, for which the analogy works. I think you misinterpreted.
|
|